• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Chromebook
  • Chrome
  • Chromecast
  • Assistant

Chrome Story

Chromebooks Made Simple

  • About
  • Privacy
  • YouTube
Home / Google Chrome / This is Why Google Chrome Does not have the “Google Toolbar”

This is Why Google Chrome Does not have the “Google Toolbar”

June 18, 2009 by Dinsan Francis | Updated: September 12, 2020 65 Comments

I found many people searching for google toolbar support for google chrome, and wondering why, it is not added to google chrome yet, both being Google’s projects and very popular at that.

However, Google Is Bringing a lot of feature of Google Toolbar to Chrome by default. Very soon, we will have the translation inbuilt to chrome via a Translation Bar and for others, there are official extensions available.

I have written an article to help you get all those features back to Chrome – Google Toolbar for Chrome – Complete Guide

I also had no idea why this is so. But when I was uninstalling Google Toolbar from firefox, I kinda figured out why it is not there on Chrome yet.

Fact that we all know : We love the simple layout of Google Chrome for many reasons, and the most important reason : It gives more screen space. Google Chrome is designed to give you a better browsing experience, as far as space is concerned, and they have done this very well, and that does not come very easily … I am sure they have worked very hard on this.

Toolbar Chrome

If you have noticed, when Extensions are enabled, Google Chrome will not let them take more space from your screen area, that’s how they are making the extensions work too.

All this hard work, and they add Google Tool Bar to Chrome … then it will look a MESS !!

because it consumes so much from the screenspace… correct people ? Well, that should be the reason for Chrome still being away from Google Toolbar.

What Makes Me Think This Way

When you uninstall Google Toolbar on Firefox, you are supposed to tell them why you are doing that,  a feedback . And one among the most common reasons listed for you to select from is, ” It’s Taking My Screen Space” ( or something similar ? ). So, I would say, Google have enough feedback from toolbar users ( who uninstalled it ?  ) stating that they don’t want the google toolbar to take up more space.

So, in the current format, it’s not wise to add Google Toolbar to Chrome … what you think ?

Filed Under: Google Chrome

About Dinsan Francis

Content Strategist and Digital Minimalist. Loves testing new Chromebook features and writing about them. Favorite Chrome OS Channel is Canary. | Twitter

Fresh Stories

  • Chromebooks to Get a Shortcut Customization App
  • Chrome to Support Apple’s ‘Screen Time’
  • Chrome to Support CSS Container Queries

Free Updates in Email

Want our next story or guide in your email for free? Enter your email address and click Subscribe.

Join 3,969 other subscribers

New Here?

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dwight Stegall says

    June 19, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    I have a “Search” folder on the Bookmarks Bar with links to about 300 search engines in it of various types sorted out into subfolders.

    Now I don’t need Google Toolbar that hogs too much memory.

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      June 25, 2009 at 1:21 pm

      300 search engines ? 😀 pretty cool 😀

      Reply
  2. Dwight Stegall says

    June 19, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    You shouldn’t use toolbars and weather widgets. They use up way too much memory and Slooooooooooooooooooow down your browser. Toolbars are only offered to you so their owners can spy on you. So why be spied on and slow down your browser when there are alternatives.

    I use the method above and I also use IE Style Accelerators through Kallout.com. It works in all of your browsers. I have 9 browsers and it works in all of them. No they don’t know I’m telling you this so don’t consider it spam.

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      June 25, 2009 at 1:22 pm

      true, I haven’t seen many people using toolbars, actually ..

      Reply
  3. FTB says

    July 19, 2009 at 2:12 am

    I don’t use Chrome for it’s extra screen space, I mean I could configure FF that way if it was that important. I use it because it’s extremely fast, seems to lag a lot less than FF and it’s a new shinier thingy.

    I use Google toolbar all the time. It’s a quick and easy way to do searches (for me at least). It has a lot of features I can put right up on the toolbar and use immediately.

    Frankly I’m not going to go to a bookmarked folder then grab the search engine I want and so on. It might work for some–and that’s great–but it’s a step backward in usability I think.

    Google Chrome with no Google toolbar 9 months later? Bizarre to say the least. One of the reasons I don’t use Chrome as my primary is the lack of extensions like the toolbar and zoom buttons (we each have our own likes).

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      July 19, 2009 at 12:53 pm

      but you can search using the address bar, I think it’s better than the google toolbar search option 🙂

      but if you are using google toolbar for some other stuff … right, you will miss it !

      Reply
      • Carlos says

        June 18, 2011 at 7:56 pm

        If I only want to search, I don’t need the toolbar, but do you really think that all I need? Do I have to create a map, or mail, or calc, or translate short cut in my links? Nope.. I don’t think so
        Usabilty is key for me, and that is the only reason I don’t use Chrome, but i do check from time to time to see if a toolbar has been added, in the mean time, the other browsers will do

        Reply
  4. chrome story says

    August 4, 2009 at 10:18 pm

    well, this will be addressed soon 🙂 you will have the bookmarks and other browsing data on clouds !

    Reply
    • david says

      November 9, 2012 at 2:57 pm

      three years later and still no sign of this “soon” feature 🙁

      Reply
  5. Scruff says

    August 6, 2009 at 7:12 pm

    If chrome is so worried about screen real estate, why does their omnibar span the entire width of the browser?

    In order to incorporate the google toolbar simply cut the omnibar in half and use some of that space for the toolbar links – that’s what I do in Firefox and I currently have just as much screen space.

    Reply
  6. chrome story says

    October 6, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    you can install a chrome plugin to get google bookmarks on your chrome installation !

    Reply
  7. jose padin says

    October 8, 2009 at 8:58 am

    How to you get a drop down clickable list of your google bookmarks?
    I don’t like the suggestion to add google bookmarks as an engine in chrome.
    I need bookmarks to follow me from computer to computer and google toolbar is the quickest way to do this.

    Reply
  8. Todd says

    October 12, 2009 at 9:39 pm

    I would want Spell Check, in addition to, Bookmarks in Chrome as both contain personal settings that I don’t want to update in multiple places.

    Reply
  9. Samuel Bronson says

    October 14, 2009 at 8:21 pm

    I’m with Scruff and Zadok: Who uses Google Toolbar for the toolbar? I generally just pinch a couple of buttons off of it, primarily the bookmarks button. Maybe once in a while I will enable the toolbar itself temporarily if I want to use one of the other buttons.Really, I think it would make more sense to call it Google for your Firefox Toolbars than Google Toolbar. The Toolbar itself may well just be a carry-over from the IE version of Google Toolbar, which really does have to be an entire toolbar (however, I believe it can share a row with other toolbars, unlike in Firefox).

    Reply
  10. Silpa T says

    October 26, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    Chrome->settings(The wrench symbol)->Import bookmarks and Settings->Google toolbar
    The above will get you all the google toolbar bookmarks.

    Reply
  11. Hisao Yatsuhashi says

    November 5, 2009 at 12:04 am

    I would gladly sacrifice a little bit of screen real estate for the Google Toolbar. Lack of toolbar is the main reason I’m not using Chrome. Most essential features: Google bookmark access (synchronized), AuotFill, AutoLink, and Send to.

    Reply
  12. krasno says

    November 7, 2009 at 1:12 pm

    I need the google toolbar because of the translate option, among other things. Aren’t there plugins or anything? 🙁

    Reply
  13. MCMalkemus says

    November 10, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    I think I’ll switch back to Firefox until an option for the Google Toolbar exists. With dyslexia, I must have a spell checker. It is after all, an OPTION, not a requirement. If Google isn’t willing to provide it because they got ‘feedback’, that their decision, and it doesn’t prevent me from using Google Toolbar, just from using Chrome.

    Reply
  14. kiran says

    November 11, 2009 at 6:00 pm

    i dont think google is not using toolbar because of the space. they already have one row for bookmarks. they could have used the same space for the toolbar.

    May be they are trying to find a better way then the existing toolbar.

    Reply
  15. Kumar Amit Ranjan says

    November 13, 2009 at 5:23 am

    I am not too much agree with the reason. If google is concerned about space, then it would have changed the design of the toolbar to fit in the space. like one small icon and showing other features on dropdown when u click on it.

    Reply
  16. Jose Padin says

    November 13, 2009 at 7:52 am

    Silpa T is the google bookmarks option new?
    Will it Autosink? This is good.

    It worked like a charm but would be great if it was able to automatically sink back to the google cloud. so I can get them on different browsers and different computers.

    Reply
  17. dalbir says

    November 29, 2009 at 3:29 am

    google toolbar have more feature then just the bookmarks
    the spell check i love
    the various options that let me quickly search in a new tab
    and highlight any thing that i searched in the toolbar
    way faster to search in thru the toolbar becuase u can set it up to open a new tab when u hit enter …. u can highlight what u searched for with one click
    i mean how small of screens are u working with
    one toolbar is not going to decrease the space

    Reply
  18. Steve Charpentier says

    December 21, 2009 at 4:47 am

    The reason there is not a google toolbar for chrome is that google does not need it.

    By using chrome google already knows everything you do online, with another browser they need to add the spyware toolbar

    Reply
  19. Gale Teschendorf says

    December 23, 2009 at 11:47 am

    I love AutoFill.
    Can’t they have a more button to bring up add ons?
    It would not reduce the real estate.

    Reply
  20. ali says

    December 24, 2009 at 12:22 am

    we need google toolbar for translation especially

    Reply
  21. SmokerDude says

    January 6, 2010 at 10:42 pm

    Frankly all I care about is having all the bookmarks I saved on it. Just over here on Chrome.

    Reply
  22. jd says

    January 9, 2010 at 4:22 am

    But if people WANT it, then it is not taking up too much space as far as they are concerned. As long as it’s an option you can turn on and off, what’s the issue?

    Reply
  23. David says

    January 19, 2010 at 2:36 am

    Google toolbar has many nice features. One that I use frequently is the “highlight” feature and the ability to jump directly to any keyword that I used in the search. It’s very nice for quickly finding things on a large webpage with lots of text. The spellchecker is also great! There are many great extensions with Firefox that simply are not available with Chrome. Chrome is like a very capable smartphone that has no app support.

    Reply
  24. Greg says

    January 19, 2010 at 10:54 am

    I miss the auto-translate feature that is provided by the Google Toolbar. With it you can simply click a button to translate a web page from its current language to your default language of choice. I continue to use Firefox as my main browser for now.

    Reply
  25. jfk says

    January 20, 2010 at 5:24 pm

    What about the page-rank ? Besides… its Google Toolbar… people should have the option to install it if they want to.

    Reply
  26. googleLover says

    January 22, 2010 at 8:14 pm

    As most of you said above I miss Google Toolbar primarily for the bookmarks feature . Also I can click the drop down and select my previous search keys without re-typing them.

    Reply
  27. railcrew says

    January 22, 2010 at 11:00 pm

    I miss a spell check and a few other features of the “toolbar” that could easily be added to one of the pull-down menus in the upper right, or as a hotkey like the new bookmarks feature (ctrl+B)

    Reply
  28. Robert says

    January 26, 2010 at 10:48 am

    This theory doesn’t make sense, since right now I have a Google Bookmark Bar across the top of my Chrome screen where on it I have icons for various webpages, calendar, dictionary, etc., and a bookmarks icon where I store new bookmarks from Chrome and have downloaded others from my Google Tool Bar on Firefox. Its not the same as the Google Tool Bar because it is not stored off-line, but it still shares the same space the Google Tool Bar would go. So it doesn’t make sense Google would not offer their Tool Bar for space sake, yet allow some thing similar to fill the space.

    Reply
  29. Rrabbitt! says

    January 29, 2010 at 3:46 am

    I don’t agree that Google Toolbar takes up any appreciable amount of space, unless, of course, you have other toolbars installed? I don’t care either way about the toolbar but AutoFill and the Spell Checker are things I frequently use and until they are available in Chrome it will just be another icon on my desktop.

    Reply
  30. Joe says

    January 31, 2010 at 7:33 pm

    VERY DISAPPOINTED with google recently. No toolbar for their highly touted Chrome. Toolbar doesn’t work with COMCAST, VISTA, I.E. 8. Try to alleged toolbar compatible IE 8 and it won’t install. GMAIL doesn’t work with very popular semantec products.

    GMAIL still disfunctional. Their help is useless. Wrote GMAIL problem months ago and jst got an answer (FOund an answer….go back to version 1.0.

    I guess the $$ are now blinding teir creativity

    Reply
  31. paladin says

    February 7, 2010 at 6:37 am

    Chrome is not need Google toolbar actually, because the toolbar is designed for other non-Google browsers virtually, so when that guys develop Chrome, you can type words in address area to search, and there are (or will be) more and more great and useful extensions to support the feature functions.

    Reply
  32. Lloyd says

    February 16, 2010 at 9:58 am

    For me toolbar is the thing that keeps me from using chrome — working as I do across 5 different computers regularly, the synchronized bookmarks are a must have.

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      February 16, 2010 at 10:27 am

      @ Lloyd

      but bookmark syc is now available !! and most of google toolbar features are inbuilt in google chrom

      Reply
  33. Antonio Sanchez says

    March 14, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    Yes, some features of the google toolbar are included in chrome, but I miss a clean blank space to type the search subject rather than typing in the already crowded navegation bar. Most importantly, I miss the option of highlighting the key words in order to find them straight away. I know Google chrome has a similiar feature but you have to click several times to get to it and and it doesn’t let you just write a new word that you want to look for in the page you are in. Anyone doing serious and complex search jobs would miss these features. Actually, for me the rest of the google bar features are irrelevant.

    I am keeping firefox until the bar is is included in chrome.

    Reply
  34. chrome story says

    March 15, 2010 at 12:41 pm

    @ Antonio Sanchez

    but isn’t it easier to search using the address bar ( Omni Bar ) ?

    Reply
  35. Jose Padin says

    March 15, 2010 at 7:30 pm

    The point that people keep missing is that with google toolbar your bookmarks follow you.
    Its not a 1 time Sync.
    They are always there for you on any computer you log into.
    In Chrome you can do a 1 time import and even after you do a 1 time import the format is all out of order an unorganized.

    Reply
  36. wmsn says

    March 17, 2010 at 11:52 pm

    I use Chrome for my personal browsing, but I can’t use it for my research work. I need Googlebar Lite’s ability to highlight multiple search terms at a time on a page. I use this feature many, many times a day. It helps me find articles from specific sites that are in a Google search. Then it lets me go through the pages that I open from the Google search and skim for search terms quickly, so I can tell very rapidly whether this page will be useful to me or not. PLEASE Chrome developers, include this feature in Chrome as soon as possible.

    It would be nice to have a way to access different search types (news, images, etc), right at the search bar.

    An efficient auto-fill feature is missed by most, I believe. Having to click for each line of a form is not nearly as efficient.

    I agree with most of the comments above, about features that are missing without the toolbar. I hope the developers can add each of them as quickly as possible.

    I love, love, love the new translation feature in Chrome. Now I guess I’m greedy and want more features built-in, if we can’t have the Google toolbar.

    Reply
  37. Hagrinas says

    March 25, 2010 at 5:09 am

    The only problem with the argument against a Google toolbar is that it makes no sense. Having a Google toolbar available will not cause browsers to lose any screen space. It will not slow the browser down. It will not cause clutter. Why? Because add ons are optional. Anybody who does n0t want the toolbar already hasn’t it. The overwhelming number of people who are searching for it don’t have to install it either unless they want to, and if they do, they won’t mind the real estate issue because that’s what they want. The only problem is that they can’t add it because it does not exist.

    Mozilla/Firefox/etc. had a simple and elegant solution: Design a browser that’s extensible so users can customize it with the features that they want. It should not have to affect other users when a feature becomes available to those who select it.

    Well guess what?? Google did the same thing. They came up with an extensible browser that should render this sort of discussion moot. The power of Chrome should be that arguments like this never even have to come up. Having a toolbar available, and only for those who want it, is the whole point of designing Chrome with its inherent architecture.

    I don’t need the toolbar. I just need the functionality. If it were there, I would not have to be looking for it.

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      March 26, 2010 at 5:31 am

      @ Hagrinas

      Most of Google toolbar services are being built in to Google Chrome browser. There are extensions for most of the other stuff. But for people who are lookinghttps://chromestory.com/wp-admin/edit-comments.php#comments-form for a “bar” you might get disappointed.

      Reply
    • Sam says

      August 20, 2011 at 7:53 am

      Bravo, Hagrinas!!!

      Reply
  38. Jose Padin says

    March 26, 2010 at 7:09 am

    @Hagrinas That has to be the single greatest post by anyone I have ever read on an anonymous board. Way to explain the obvious to people that are struggling to understand the obvious.
    @ChromeStory How can you completely misunderstand the obvious point Hagrinas has made.
    There is no pro or con argument for a toolbar. The people that want it. Want it. The people that don’t. Don’t need to know it exists. That way they won’t have to live in fear that there precious screen space may be encroached upon by an extremely useful tool. A tool that you don’t have to spend half a day googling around the internet trying to recreate the tool through a bunch of half functional hacks.

    Reply
  39. chrome story says

    March 26, 2010 at 7:23 am

    @ Jose Padin

    I am trying to convince myself that Google is taking a different approach to Toolbar on chrome, say, without the bar. But I have to admit this process it – DEAD SLOW –

    Reply
  40. Hagrinas says

    April 11, 2010 at 7:10 am

    Thanks, Jose.

    I don’t know how many extensions there are currently, but it would be easy for anybody here to find at least 100 that are not installed. It would make sense to go through each of those hundred and write a few paragraphs about why it was not needed, such as problems with real estate issues, duplication of functions, etc… But it would only make sense to those who would argue against a Google toolbar equivalent.

    Nevertheless, there are still those who will argue against one and miss the point. I don’t happen to need a stock ticker extension, so should I seek out anybody who is looking for one and argue against it? If there were a forum for one, would it make sense for me to even read the forum and comment? Should I try to talk people out of one?

    For those who are interested in any extension whatsoever, the debate should be over what’s in it and how it works. For those who are not interested, they have no reason to look for it in the first place, much less care about whether it gets developed, what gets put in it, or why others might want it.

    Chrome developers should merely be assuring that there is a way for others to implement extensions. Remember that it’s not really the Google toolbar that one would be emulating–it would be the googlebar. It was originally an add on for Mozilla/seamonkey/firefox and was not part of the browser and not a Google product.

    Google chose to copy it and make their version available. It’s a legitimate debate (for them) whether THEY should develop one for Chrome. It’s NOT a legitimate debate whether ONE SHOULD BE DEVELOPED. That’s the difference that people seem to be missing.

    The question then becomes whether there are any shortcomings in Chrome that would prevent an extension developer from implementing any features that a user would desire.

    Reply
  41. DeathDrive says

    July 23, 2010 at 10:12 pm

    Why didn’t I come across this article earlier? That’s some great analysis man. Thanks a lot.

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      July 23, 2010 at 10:19 pm

      you are welcome ! thanks a lot for ur kind words

      Reply
  42. Jose Padin says

    October 3, 2010 at 12:22 am

    Forgot to post that I found an extensions that does just what we discussed.

    https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/jdnejaepfmacfdmhkplckpfdcjgbeode?hl=en

    It works pretty well. I highly recommend.

    Reply
  43. chrome story says

    October 3, 2010 at 1:48 am

    I think they are making most of the things inbuilt … don’t you think so ?

    Reply
  44. jimmy says

    November 25, 2010 at 8:10 pm

    Yeah i totally agree with your point. I m also really disappointed because Google Chrome didn’t have Google Toolbar 🙁

    Reply
    • chrome story says

      November 25, 2010 at 8:12 pm

      but isn’t it giving you most of the features inbuilt now ?

      Reply
  45. Manish says

    March 13, 2011 at 9:30 am

    I don’t agree at all, Toolbar is a feature which can be used and turned off, for those who need space can remove it, I am a web developer and checking Google PR for each page is my natural instinct, … cause there is not Google tool bar I have to copy and paste urls in Firefox, I love chrome for its speed and not hanging , which happens a lot in firefox… but cant use it freely… there is a SEO for Chrome TOOL… but stupid thing shows the PR of the domain , not PR of the page also you have to make an extra click and wait till it loads …. we are living in revolution era of Computers and it is our responsibility to create things that are versatile … just to save space … it is not justify that it is not usable to professionals and we would not put features…

    Secondly … checking Javascript errors in Chrome is also another topic i may discus some other day… thanks

    Seems like google only want internet surfers to use Chrome not Developers so they can manage the true volume of the hits a website get.

    Reply
    • businesses for sale says

      December 12, 2011 at 4:37 am

      There is only SEO for Chrome as i have mentioned above, if there is any other extension, please if you can tell me where to download it which tells me PR of the page like google Toolbar.

      Also regarding the JScript errors, they are not as simple as Fireworks or IE.

      Dont misunderstand me, I use Chrome as my Primary Browser, but as we are discussing, things can be better for general users.

      Reply
  46. Sam says

    August 20, 2011 at 7:50 am

    Why are so many people concerned with my wanting and enjoying a Google toolbar? If someone does not want it, then good for them, yet I do want it and have not found convenient replacements for the features I use daily i.e. the word search and highlight feature.

    I am well aware of every browsers ability to search web pages, yet with Google toolbar it only had to be typed one time and required no shortcut keys combined with cutting and pasting of multiple terms.

    It is my real estate correct? Or do I have to get H.O.A.’s approval to set up my screen layout…?

    Reply
  47. beverly751 says

    August 20, 2011 at 8:21 am

    Google Chrome alone will not do what I need it to do. I need to highlight the names of 41 foreign language newspapers inside the URLs on a Google Search in a foreign language. I have tried all the highlighting add-ons mentioned for Chrome. They will not do the job. Using the Google Lite toolbar with Firefox, it is a simple matter to paste all 41 names in and presto, they light up like a neon sign. This allows me to skip all the other dreck I would otherwise be forced to examine. I NEED this capability. If it is provided in an addon, it sill not slow your computer down, now will it?

    Reply
  48. Sam says

    August 20, 2011 at 11:08 pm

    @James You (<<<Underline it) can't do with the performance loss, and I support your (<<<Underline again) being able to decide what is right for your computer. Why are so concerned with what I want to do with mine?

    Mother Russia has your monthly toilet paper allotment ready for you.

    I know how I use my computer, and enjoy utilizing features that cut down on clicks, drags and typing i.e. typing a search query one time and having the ability to, in a single click, search for any word within that query across web pages that would take days to read in their entirety.

    I do not believe the problem to be people whom cannot articulate themselves, so much as folks like you James who for whatever reason a) can't comprehend what is being written or/and b) think we should all do things exactly like you do, that being the only way to do them in the mind of unthinking robot masses we can label James, James1, James2 etc…

    I choose willingly to give up computing resources and screen space to incorporate a feature I enjoy and use every time I use a web browser, I would not ask you, James, to install it just because I like it. Please forward me a list of what outfits I am to wear for next week…

    Reply
  49. Reshma says

    September 2, 2011 at 12:38 pm

    http://afterthedeadline.com/ – spell check

    Reply
  50. Reshma says

    September 8, 2011 at 12:09 pm

    @wmsn
    https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ccaikggmppdolhcehimngikgiafmdcep – for highlighting multiple search terms.

    Reply
  51. Jose Padin says

    September 8, 2011 at 6:14 pm

    What’s funny is that over 2 years later this is still being discussed, and even funnier in the same exact way.

    2009: “A toolbar isn’t neccasasry because of performance and screen real-estate.”

    2009: “Thats a bit prescriptive. I would like all the tools I use in one easy accessible place. I’d rather not search high and far for semi-functional extensions.”

    2009: “No you’re wrong you don’t want it to effect your performance.”

    2009: “Actually STFU and don’t worry about my performance, I want the toolbar.”

    2011: “You still don’t want a toolbar because of “Performance” (Side bar this is a pretty silly argument, does it really matter if a page loads in 0.01 seconds or 0.05 secs?)

    2011: “Actually I still do, and you’re really still me what I want and don’t want?”

    2011: “Here are some crappy semi-functional extensions that don’t do everything in one place like the googletoolbar. ”

    2011: “This is comedy.”

    Reply
  52. Alberte says

    December 6, 2011 at 9:50 pm

    The lack of the ability of automatic synchronization of my bookmarks between browsers is the reason that I do not use Chrome at all. In the office where I work I need IE for our application and at home I use Firefox because I can access my bookmarks through the Google toolbar, so I need this synchronization. I do not care about presence or lack of an additional toolbar, but I care to access my bookmarks everywhere independently of the browser brand I use. If Chrome will provide me with the access to my bookmarks that I use in Firefox and IE I will switch to Chrome instead of Firefox at home.

    Reply
  53. jtgd says

    December 12, 2011 at 4:57 am

    Why not use Xmarks? It works great to keep bookmarks synced. I use it between home and work, both Firefox, but it is available on Chrome too.

    Reply
  54. rcrow490 says

    October 29, 2012 at 1:53 am

    I have been using the YAGBE extension for a long time. I think it works better than the bookmarks feature in the Google toolbar.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Stay in Touch

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Google
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

WordPress | Copyright © 2021 Chrome Story | Chrome is a registered trademark of Google Inc.